State v. Plank’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2010
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 131 Wis. 2d 246 - State v. Bangert · State v. Bollig · State v. Byrge · State v. Trochinski · State v. Hampton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The distinction between direct and collateral consequences essentially recognizes that it would be unreasonable and impractical to require a circuit court to be cognizant of every conceivable consequence before the court accepts a plea.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The lack of parole under truth-in-sentencing does not mean [a defendant] will serve more time than the maximum penalty of which the court informed him [or her]. Thus, truth-in-sentencing does not affect his [or her] range of punishment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a definite, immediate, and largely automatic effect on the range of a defendant's punishment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.