State v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
58 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably State v. Low (2008), State v. Winfield (2006)
58 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Buggs · State v. Litherland · 18 Cal. 4th 385 - People v. Majors · State v. Winfield · Will v. Hallock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'@ an error exists; (M) the error should have been obvious to the trial court; and (iii) the error is harmful, i.e., absent the error, there is a reasonable likelihood of a more favorable outcome.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cox · State v. Martinez“but for counsel's deficient performance there is a reasonable probability that the outcome of the trial would have been different.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Corona · State v. Idrees“may refuse, sua sponte, to consider inadequately briefed issues”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.