Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 UT 65 - State v. Robison

State v. Robison’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
2
states following
May 2020
most recently cited

46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently May 2020 · most notably State v. Johnson (2017), State v. Hummel (2017)

46 state decisions

400200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Holgate · 74 Ill. 2d 379 - Saldana v. Wirtz Cartage Co. · Bailey v. Bayles · State v. Verde · State v. Archambeau

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “); State v. Robison, 2006 UT 65, ¶ 21 , 147 P.3d 448 (It falls squarely upon an appellant to surmount the filing, briefing, and persuasion burdens associated with an appeal.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'that 'other than for jurisdictional reasons [the court of appeals] should not normally search the record for unargued and unbriefed reasons to reverse a [district] court judgment'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(aln appellate court that does the lifting for an appellant distorts [the] fundamental allocation of benefits and burdens”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.