¶1concurring.
¶2[¶ 20] Because the result in this case is dictated by the decision in Anderson v. Town of Durham, 2006 ME 39, 895 A.2d 944, 1 concur.
2008 Me. 108
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided July 1, 2008
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · decided 2008-07-01
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2019
7 state decisions
Relies on Anderson v. Town of Durham
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2008-07-01
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1concurring.
¶2[¶ 20] Because the result in this case is dictated by the decision in Anderson v. Town of Durham, 2006 ME 39, 895 A.2d 944, 1 concur.