2008 UT App 409 - State v. Hodge’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2011
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Tillman · West Valley City v. Majestic Investment Co. · State v. Maurer · State v. Hubbard · State v. Hopkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“present, in comprehensive and fastidious order, every scrap of competent evidence introduced at trial which supports the very findings [he] resists,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“'To demonstrate that the evidence is insufficient to support [a] jury verdict, the one challenging the verdict must marshal the evidence in support of the verdict and then demonstrate that the evidence is insufficient when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdiet.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“ferret out a fatal flaw in the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.