201 N.C. App. 233 - State v. Stitt’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2703 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2707 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2708 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on State v. Smith · State v. Powell · State v. Hennis · Richley v. Norris · State v. Marshall Norman Hicks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Armed robbery is defined as the taking of the personal property of another in his presence or from his person without his consent by endangering or threatening his life with a firearm or other deadly weapon with the taker knowing that he is not entitled to the property and the taker intending to permanently deprive the owner of the property. To be found guilty of robbery with a dangerous weapon, the defendant’s threatened use or use of a dangerous weapon must precede or be concomitant with the taking, or be so joined by time and circumstances with the taking as to be part of one continuous transaction. Where a continuous transaction occurs, the temporal order of the threat or use of a dangerous weapon and the taking is immaterial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. James“State v. Swift, 105 N.C.App. 550 , 556, 414 S.E.2d 65 , 68-69 (1992) (emphasis added); accord State v. McKinney, 361 N.C. 53 , 56, 637 S.E.2d 868 , 871 (2006) (stating that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[o]ur Courts will not assume ownership or a possessory interest in property based on mere possession.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.