¶1The court having found as a fact that there was no contract such as is made the foundation of the plaintiff’s claim, there is nothing left of the case. As no error appears in the dismissal of the bill or in any proceeding connected with it, we affirm the decree entered by the learned court below.
201 Pa. 11
Eisaman v. Eisaman
Decided November 8, 1901
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1901-11-08
Appeal, No. 42, Oct. T., 1901, by plaintiffs, from decree of C. P. Westmoreland Co., No. 334, Equity Docket, dismissing bill in equity in case of John Eisaman and Laura J. Kuhn v. Albert Eisaman and Dr. Reuben Eisaman. Bill in equity for an account. From the record it appeared that a farm belonging to Lewis Eisaman was sold by the sheriff to two of Eisaman’s sons, the defendants. The purchasers subsequently sold the property at a profit.
Affirmed · Decided 1901-11-08