201 Pa. 249
Decided January 6, 1902
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1902-01-06
Appeal, No. 41, Oct. T., 1901, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., March T., 1900, No. 323, on verdict for plaintiff in case of James M. Bailey, trading as Phillips, Nimick & Company, v. M. D. Wayman and The American Plate Glass Company. Assumpsit for goods sold and delivered.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1922
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1902-01-06
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The assignments of error relate to the charge of the court, to the answer to the plaintiff’s first point and to the answer to the defendant’s third point. Tn the answers to the points referred to we have not discerned any perceptible error, and the same may be said of the charge of the court. It follows that *252no reason or cause appears for a reversal of the judgment entered by the court below.
¶2Judgment affirmed.