201 Pa. 277
Decided January 6, 1902
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1902-01-06
Appeal, No. 105, Oct. T., 1901, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., June T., 1900, No. 272, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Robert Russell v. E. L. Stratton, George W. Lewis and W. P. Woods, trading as Stratton, Lewis & Company. Assumpsit for cut stone and use of tools. Before Collier, J. At the trial it appeared that plaintiff had leased a quarry from one Kepple.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1902-01-06
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently October 2002
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The main question in the case was-whether the property .in controversy had been abandoned by the plaintiff. This was to be determined from a consideration of the nature of the property and the conduct of the plaintiff in relation to it, and the question was essentially one of fact for the jury.
¶2The judgment is affirmed.