¶1It seems to us that the learned judge of the court below did *11not err in granting the nonsuit or in refusing to take it off. It plainly appears in his opinion that nothing was shown in the evidence which would have warranted a submission of the case to the jury. The appeal is therefore dismissed and the nonsuit affirmed.
201 Pa. 9
Fox v. Peoples
Decided November 8, 1901
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1901-11-08
Appeal, No. 18, Oct. T., 1901, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Westmoreland Co., Nov. T., 1899, No. 178, refusing to take off nonsuit in the case of William Fox v. John M. Peoples. Assumpsit to recover alleged profits on the sale of real estate. Before McConnell, J. At the trial it appeared that William Fox, plaintiff, and his brother, were assignees of their father, David Fox. On November 13, 1885, they sold under an order of court certain real estate of their assignor.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1901-11-08
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1932
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →