2011 UT App 356 - State v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Litherland · State v. Tennyson · State v. Ott · State v. Arguelles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“inability to consult with ... counsel and to participate in the proceedings ... with a reasonable degree of rational understanding.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a rational and factual understanding of the proceedings ... or of the punishment specified for the offense charged,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“behavior was anything out of the ordinary”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.