Walker v. State

                                 Cite as 

                  ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
                                       DIVISION II
                                      No.CR-13-482


                                               Opinion Delivered   December 11, 2013

  ALFRED JAMES WALKER                    APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI
                                         COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,
                               APPELLANT FOURTH DIVISION
                                         [NO. CR-12-2081]
  V.
                                               HONORABLE HERBERT WRIGHT,
  STATE OF ARKANSAS                            JUDGE

                                 APPELLEE AFFIRMED


                              RHONDA K. WOOD, Judge

          Appellant Alfred James Walker was convicted of theft of property greater than

$1,000 but less than $5,000, a Class D felony. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of

the evidence supporting his conviction. His argument is not preserved for appeal, and we

affirm.

          Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 33.1 requires a defendant to renew a motion

for directed verdict or dismissal at the “close of the case” in order to preserve for review

any question pertaining to the sufficiency of the evidence. To preserve for appeal the issue

of the sufficiency of the evidence in a criminal case, the appellant must move for a

directed verdict both at the close of the State’s case and at the close of the whole case.

King v. State, 

, 

 (1999). Here, Walker moved to dismiss the

charges against him at the close of the State’s evidence. However, at the close of all
                               Cite as 

evidence, he failed to renew his motion. Following the strict standard set out in Rule

33.1(c), Walker failed to preserve for appellate review the issue of sufficiency of the

evidence.

      Affirmed.

      GLOVER and HIXSON, JJ., agree.

      William R. Simpson, Jr., Public Defender, and Brandy Turner, Deputy Public

Defender, by: Margaret Egan, Deputy Public Defender, for appellant.

      Dustin McDaniel, Att’y Gen., by: Kathryn Henry, Ass’t Att’y Gen., and Nathan

Aylesworth, Law Student Admitted to Practice Pursuant to Rule XV of the Rules

Governing Admission to the Bar of the Supreme Court under the supervision of Darnisa

Evans Johnson, Deputy Att’y Gen., for appellee.




                                            2