Pederson v. State

¶1Filed 1/23/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court

¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT

¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

¶4

¶5

¶6

¶72013 ND 7

¶8

¶9

¶10

¶11Tate Allister Pederson, Petitioner and Appellant

¶12

¶13v.

¶14

¶15State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

¶16

¶17

¶18

¶19No. 20120331

¶20

¶21

¶22

¶23Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Wickham Corwin, Judge.

¶24

¶25AFFIRMED.

¶26

¶27Per Curiam.

¶28

¶29Bobbi B. Weiler, 418 East Rosser Avenue, Suite 320, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.

¶30

¶31Reid A. Brady and Tanya J. Martinez, Assistant State’s Attorneys, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

¶32Pederson v. State

¶33No. 20120331

¶34

¶35Per Curiam.

¶36[¶1] Tate Pederson appeals from a district court judgment denying his application for post-conviction relief.  Pederson argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).  

¶37[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

¶38Carol Ronning Kapsner

¶39Dale V. Sandstrom

¶40Daniel J. Crothers

¶41Mary Muehlen Maring