Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2014 Ark. 222

Smith v. Wright

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 14, 2014

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 2014-05-14

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2024

1 state decisions

Applies AR 9 § 9-11-208

Relies on Dodge v. Lee · Myers v. McAdams

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2014-05-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

                       Cite as 
2014 Ark. 222

          SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
                         No.   CV-14-414

NATHANIEL SMITH, M.D., MPH,        Opinion Delivered   May 14, 2014
INTERIM DIRECTOR OF THE
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF             APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI
HEALTH, IN HIS OFFICIAL            COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
CAPACITY, AND HIS SUCCESSORS       [NO. 60CV-13-2662]
IN OFFICE;
RICHARD WEISS, DIRECTOR OF         HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER
THE ARKANSAS                       CHARLES PIAZZA, JUDGE
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND
ADMINISTRATION,                    APPEAL DISMISSED WITHOUT
IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, AND      PREJUDICE; PETITION FOR
HIS SUCCESSORS                     EMERGENCY STAY DENIED.
IN OFFICE; PULASKI
CIRCUIT/COUNTY CLERK,
LARRY CRANE, IN HIS OFFICIAL
CAPACITY, AND
HIS SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST;
WHITE COUNTY CLERK,
CHERYL EVANS, IN HER OFFICIAL
CAPACITY, AND
HER SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST;
LONOKE COUNTY CLERK,
WILLIAM “LARRY” CLARKE, IN HIS
OFFICIAL CAPACITY,
AND HIS SUCCESSORS IN
INTEREST; CONWAY COUNTY
CLERK, DEBBIE HARTMAN, IN HER
OFFICIAL CAPACITY,
AND HER SUCCESSORS IN OFFICE;
SALINE COUNTY CLERK,
DOUG CURTIS, IN HIS OFFICIAL
CAPACITY, AND HIS
SUCCESSORS IN OFFICE;
FAULKNER COUNTY CLERK,
MELINDA REYNOLDS, IN HER
OFFICIAL CAPACITY, AND
HER SUCCESSORS IN OFFICE;
WASHINGTON COUNTY
CLERK, BECKY LEWALLEN, IN HER
OFFICIAL CAPACITY,
                       Cite as 
2014 Ark. 222

AND HER SUCCESSORS IN OFFICE

                   APPELLANTS

V.

M. KENDALL WRIGHT AND JULIA E.
WRIGHT; INDIVIDUALLY
AND ON BEHALF OF THEIR MINOR
CHILDREN, G.D.W.
AND P.L.W.; RHONDA L. EDDY AND
TREBA L. LEATH;
CAROL L. OWENS AND RANEE J.
HARP; NATALIE
WARTICK AND TOMMIE J.
WARTICK; INDIVIDUALLY
AND ON BEHALF OF THEIR MINOR
SON, T.B.W.;
KIMBERLY M. KIDWELL AND
KATHRYN E. SHORT;
JAMES BOONE AND WESLEY
GIVENS; KIMBERLY M.
ROBINSON AND FELICITY L.
ROBINSON; LINDA L. MEYERS
AND ANGELA K. SHELBY;
GREGORY A. BRUCE
AND WILLIAM D. SMITH, JR.;
MONICA J. LOYD
AND JENNIFER L. LOCHRIDGE;
JENNIFER D. MOORE
AND MANDY A. LYLES; JONATHAN
K. GOBER AND
MARK R. NORWINE; ANDRA
ALSBURY AND
AMBER GARDNER-ALSBURY;
ANGELA SPEARS GULLETTE;
AND LIVICIE C. GULLETTE;
SHANNON HAVENS; AND
RACHEL WHITTENBURG; CODY
RENEGAR; AND
THOMAS STADE; KATHERINE


                                 2
                                    Cite as 
2014 Ark. 222

HENSON AND
ANGELIA BUFORD; CHRISTOPHER
H. HORTON; AND
MICHAEL E. POTTS; JOHN
SCHENCK AND ROBERT LOYD;
WILLIAM A. KING; AND JOHN
MCCLAY RANKINE;
ARICA NAVARRO AND PATRICIA
NAVARRO; AND RANDY
EDDY-MCCAIN AND
GARY EDDY-MCCAIN

                                 APPELLEES

                                        PER CURIAM


       Before this court is the appellants’ petition for emergency stay filed by Nathaniel

Smith, M.D., Interim Director of the Arkansas Department of Health in his official capacity

and his successors in office; Richard Weiss, Director, Arkansas Department of Finance and

Administration, in his official capacity, and his successors in office; Pulaski Circuit/County

Clerk, Larry Crane, in his official capacity, and his successors in interest; White County Clerk,

Cheryl Evans, in her official capacity, and her successors and interest; Lonoke County Clerk,

William “Larry” Clarke, in his official capacity, and his successors in interest; Conway County

Clerk, Debbie Hartman, in her official capacity, and her successors in office; Saline County

Clerk, Douglas Curtis, in his official capacity, and his successors in office; Faulkner County

Clerk, Melinda Reynolds, in her official capacity, and her successors in office; Washington

County Clerk, Becky Lewallen, in her official capacity, and her successors in office

(hereinafter “the State”). Additionally before this court is the appellees’ motion to dismiss



                                               3
                                   Cite as 
2014 Ark. 222

appeal filed by M. Kendall Wright and Julia W. Wright, individually and on behalf of their

minor children, G.D.W. and P.L.W.; Rhonda L. Eddy and Treba L. Leath; Carol L. Owens

and Ranee J. Harp; Natalie Wartick and Tommie J. Wartick, individually and on behalf of

their minor son, T.B.W.; Kimberly M. Kidwell and Kathryn E. Short; James Boone and

Wesley Givens; Kimberly M. Robinson and Felicity L. Robinson; Linda L. Meyers and

Angela K. Shelby; Gregory A. Bruce and William D. Smith, Jr.; Monica J. Loyd and Jennifer

L. Lochridge; Jennifer D. Moore and Mandy A. Lyles; Jonathan K. Gover and Mark R.

Norwine; Andra Alsbury and Amber Gardner-Alsbury; Angela Spears Gullette and Livicie C.

Gullette; Shannon Havens and Rachel Whittenburg; Cody Renegar and Thomas Stade;

Katherine Henson and Angelia Buford; Christopher H. Horton and Michael E. Potts; John

Schenck and Robert Loyd; William A. King and John McClay Rankine; Arica Navarro and

Patricia Navarro; and Randy Eddy-McCain and Gary Eddy-McCain (hereinafter “Wright”).

The parties responded respectively.1

       The State petitions the court for an emergency stay of the Pulaski County Circuit

Court’s May 9, 2014 “order granting summary judgment in favor of [Wright] and finding Act

144 of 1997 and Amendment 83 unconstitutional.” The State asserts that an emergency stay

is necessary “while this court considers the State’s appeal, in order to avoid confusion and

uncertainty about the effect of the circuit court’s order on Arkansas marriage law.” Further,

the State asserts that circuit clerks across Arkansas are uncertain about whether they are


       1
       Also before this court is a separate expedited motion for stay filed by the Clerks of
White, Washington, Lonoke, and Conway County which is rendered moot for the reasons
explained in this opinion.

                                             4
                                     Cite as 
2014 Ark. 222

required to immediately issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, pursuant to the circuit

court’s order, or are required to refrain from doing so pursuant to Amendment 83.

       Wright responds that we should deny the State’s petition for emergency stay because

the circuit court has yet to rule on a pending motion for stay; therefore, the petition is

premature.

       Additionally before the court is Wright’s motion to dismiss the appeal. Wright

contends that we should dismiss the State’s appeal because there is no final order in this case.

Specifically, Wright asserts that the circuit court “only ruled on the declaratory judgment

aspect of the case and has not ruled upon the injunctive relief issue,” and “did not rule on the

constitutionality of 
Ark. Code Ann. § 9-11-208
(b), which forbids circuit court clerks from

issuing marriage licenses to persons of the same sex.” The State agrees with Wright that the

circuit court’s order fails to rule on the injunctive relief or the constitutionality of 
Ark. Code Ann. § 9-11-208
(b) and asserts that if we determine there is no final and appealable order,

then the State will not object to granting the motion to dismiss because it will file its appeal

when it is ripe. The State further responds that whether or not we dismiss the appeal, we

should use our superintending authority over circuit courts to issue the stay.

       First, with regard to the finality of the circuit court’s order, the circuit court’s order

provides in pertinent part:

       THIS COURT HEREBY FINDS the Arkansas Constitutional and Legislative ban on
       same-sex marriage through Act 144 of 1997 and Amendment 83 is unconstitutional.

       Rule 2(a)(1) of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure–Civil (2013) provides that

an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment or decree entered by the trial court. Searcy

                                                5
                                     Cite as 
2014 Ark. 222

Cnty. Counsel for Ethical Gov’t v. Hinchey, 
2011 Ark. 533
. Under Arkansas Rule of Civil

Procedure 54(b), an order that fails to adjudicate all the claims as to all the parties, whether

presented as claims, counterclaims, cross-claims, or third-party claims, is not final for purposes

of appeal. Dodge v. Lee, 
350 Ark. 480
, 
88 S.W.3d 843
 (2002). See J-McDaniel Constr. Co. v.

Dale E. Peters Plumbing Ltd., 
2013 Ark. 177
, ___ S.W.3d ___. Accordingly, here, we have

carefully reviewed the record, and the record reflects neither an adjudication of all claims nor

a proper certification pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure;

therefore, the court’s order is not final, and we have no jurisdiction to hear the appeal. See

Ark. R. Civ. P. 54(b)(2) (2013); Dodge v. Lee, 
350 Ark. 480
, 
88 S.W.3d 843
 (2002); see also

Myers v. McAdams, 
366 Ark. 435
, 
236 S.W.3d 504
 (2006). We therefore dismiss the present

appeal without prejudice.

       Second, the State asserts that even if we dismiss the appeal, we should use our

superintending authority to grant a stay because circuit and county clerks are confused as to

whether they may issue same-sex marriage licenses. We turn again to the circuit court’s

order. Here, the circuit court did not issue a ruling with regard to 
Ark. Code Ann. § 9-11
-

208(b) (Repl. 2009), “License not issued to persons of the same sex.” Therefore, the circuit

court’s order has no effect on 
Ark. Code Ann. § 9-11-208
(b) and its prohibition against

circuit and county clerks issuing same-sex marriage licenses. Accordingly, we deny the State’s

petition for an emergency stay of the circuit court’s May 9, 2014 order.

       Motion to dismiss appeal granted without prejudice; motion for emergency stay

denied.


                                                6
                                      Cite as 
2014 Ark. 222

       CORBIN AND DANIELSON, JJ., concur. By way of syllabus entry, we would grant the

motion to dismiss due to the lack of a final order and deny the petition for emergency stay

as the matter is still before the trial court.




                                                 7

/2014/ark/222 · .json · Public domain