State v. Grzeskowiak

¶1Filed 9/23/14 by Clerk of Supreme Court

¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT

¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

¶4

¶5

¶6

¶72014 ND 177

¶8

¶9

¶10

¶11State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

¶12

¶13v.

¶14

¶15Peter John Grzeskowiak, Defendant and Appellant

¶16

¶17

¶18

¶19No. 20140126

¶20

¶21

¶22

¶23Appeal from the District Court of Walsh County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable Laurie A. Fontaine, Judge.

¶24

¶25AFFIRMED.

¶26

¶27Per Curiam.

¶28

¶29Kelley M. R. Cole, Assistant State’s Attorney, 600 Cooper Avenue, Grafton, ND 58237, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

¶30

¶31Lee M. Grossman, P.O. Box 475, Valley City, ND 58072, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

¶32State v. Grzeskowiak

¶33No. 20140126

¶34

¶35Per Curiam.

¶36[¶1] Peter John Grzeskowiak appealed the denial of a motion for an extension of time to file an appeal of a criminal judgment. Grzeskowiak argues the district court abused its discretion in failing to find excusable neglect.  We have previously determined the circumstances and requirements to prove excusable neglect.   State v. DuPaul , 527 N.W.2d 238, 243-44 (N.D. 1995);   Nastrom v. Nastrom , 1998 ND 75, ¶ 8, 576 N.W.2d 215; State v. Jones , 2002 ND 163, ¶ 7, 652 N.W.2d 369; Leftbear v. State , 2007 ND 14, ¶¶ 6, 10, 727 N.W.2d 252.  We conclude the district court’s denial of the motion did not constitute an abuse of discretion.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

¶37[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

¶38Carol Ronning Kapsner

¶39Lisa Fair McEvers

¶40Daniel J. Crothers

¶41Dale V. Sandstrom