Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2014 ND 59

State v. Johnson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 2014

North Dakota Supreme Court · decided 2014-04-03

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2021

7 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2014-04-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Filed 4/3/14 by Clerk of Supreme Court

¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT

¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

¶4

¶5

¶6

¶72014 ND 59

¶8

¶9

¶10

¶11State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

¶12

¶13v.

¶14

¶15Tori Johnson, Defendant and Appellant

¶16

¶17

¶18

¶19No. 20130336

¶20

¶21

¶22

¶23Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable David W. Nelson, Judge.

¶24

¶25AFFIRMED.

¶26

¶27Per Curiam.

¶28

¶29Nathan K. Madden, Assistant State’s Attorney, Williams County State’s Attorney’s Office, P.O. Box 2047, Williston, N.D. 58802, for plaintiff and appellee.

¶30

¶31Nicole E. Foster, 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1100, Century City, California 90067, for defendant and appellant.

¶32State v. Johnson

¶33No. 20130336

¶34

¶35Per Curiam.

¶36[¶1] Tori Johnson appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after the district court denied her motion to suppress evidence and she entered a conditional guilty plea to possession of drug paraphernalia.  Johnson argues the evidence found in her home when the search warrant was executed should be suppressed because the warrant was not supported by probable cause.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), concluding there was probable cause to issue the warrant.

¶37[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

¶38Dale V. Sandstrom

¶39Carol Ronning Kapsner

¶40Lisa Fair McEvers

¶41Daniel J. Crothers

/2014/nd/59 · .json · Public domain