SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
No. CR-15-189
DEONTE EDISON Opinion Delivered September 24, 2015
APPELLANT
APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI
V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,
[NO. 60-CR-13-1295]
STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE JAMES LEON
APPELLEE JOHNSON, JUDGE
SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD
ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Appellant Deonte Edison appeals the sentencing order entered by the Pulaski County
Circuit Court, reflecting his convictions and sentences for capital murder, attempted capital
murder, and two counts of aggravated robbery. Each count was enhanced for employing a
firearm, and Edison was sentenced to a total term of life without parole plus ten years.1 On
appeal, Edison asserts that the circuit court erred in (1) prohibiting him from inquiring into
the victim’s potential civil lawsuit against him; (2) prohibiting him from cross-examining the
victim concerning her medical records; and (3) allowing the State to introduce statements
1
Edison was sentenced to life imprisonment without parole for capital murder and
twenty-five years’ imprisonment on each of the remaining convictions, to be served
concurrently. Edison’s firearm enhancements, however, were to be served consecutively to
his life sentence but concurrent to each other.
Cite as
made against him by the victim under the dying-declaration exception to the hearsay rule.
Because the record in this case is incomplete, we order that the record be supplemented.
Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-3(i) provides that in cases where the appellant
received a sentence of life imprisonment, we must review “all errors prejudicial to the
appellant in accordance with
(a).” Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-3(i)
(2015). This requires us to examine all rulings adverse to Edison made by the circuit court
on all objections, motions, and requests made by either party, including those parts of the
record needed for an understanding of each adverse ruling. See
id.
Edison’s notice of appeal
specifically designated the “entire trial record, including voir dire and opening and closing
arguments, as well as any and all audio and visual recordings, as his record of appeal in this
case.” The record on appeal, however, does not include the exhibits that were admitted
during a pretrial hearing on Edison’s motion to suppress his statements, which was denied by
the circuit court.
We cannot conduct a meaningful review of the adverse ruling against him, as Rule 4-
3(i) requires, without a complete record of the proceedings. See, e.g., Huff v. State,
(2003) (per curiam). Accordingly, we order the
circuit clerk and the court reporter to correct the omissions in the record and certify to this
court a true and complete supplemental record within fourteen days of this opinion.
Supplemental record ordered.
2
