Tilson v. State

                                       Cite as 

                 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
                                         No.   CR-14-384

GECOBA TILSON                                      Opinion Delivered February   5, 2015
                                APPELLANT
                                                   PRO SE APPEAL FROM THE
V.                                                 FAULKNER COUNTY CIRCUIT
                                                   COURT
                                                   [NO. 23CR-09-984]
STATE OF ARKANSAS
                                  APPELLEE         HONORABLE CHARLES E.
                                                   CLAWSON, JR., JUDGE

                                                   APPEAL DISMISSED.


                                         PER CURIAM


       On December 10, 2013, appellant Gecoba Tilson filed in the trial court a petition for

postconviction relief under Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 (2014). In the petition,

appellant challenged his convictions for two counts of aggravated robbery, one count of felony

theft of property, and one count of misdemeanor theft of property, with a sentence

enhancement on the aggravated-robbery charges. The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the

judgment reflecting appellant’s aggregate sentence of 276 months’ imprisonment in the Arkansas

Department of Correction. Tilson v. State, 

. The appellate court’s mandate

issued on October 8, 2013.

       The trial court denied the Rule 37.1 petition without a hearing, and appellant brought this

appeal. We dismiss the appeal without reaching the merits. While the trial court addressed the

issues in the petition in its order denying relief, the record before this court does not indicate

that the Rule 37.1 petition was timely filed, and the trial court would not therefore have had
                                          Cite as 

jurisdiction to address the merits of the petition.

       Under Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.2(c), when there was an appeal from a

judgment of conviction, a petition for relief under Rule 37.1 must be filed in the trial court

within sixty days of the date that the mandate was issued by the appellate court. Andrade-

Martinez v. State, 

 (per curiam). The sixtieth day following the issuance of the

mandate in this case fell on Saturday, December 7, 2013, and appellant’s Rule 37.1 petition must

have been filed no later than Monday, December 9, 2013, under the Rule.1

       The time limitations in Rule 37.2 are jurisdictional in nature, and, if the petition was not

filed within that period, a trial court lacks jurisdiction to grant postconviction relief. 

 Because

the record does not demonstrate that the trial court had jurisdiction to grant relief on the

petition, we dismiss the appeal. Where the lower court lacks jurisdiction, the appellate court also

lacks jurisdiction. Parker v. State, 

, ___ S.W.3d ___ (per curiam).

       Appeal dismissed.

       Gecoba Tilson, pro se appellant.

       Dustin McDaniel, Att’y Gen., by: Rebecca Kane, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.




       1
        The record does not contain any indication that the Faulkner County courthouse was
closed on Monday, December 9, 2013. Without a record that establishes jurisdiction in the trial
court to reach the merits of the petition, we must assume that the court did not have jurisdiction.
See Meraz v. State, 

 (per curiam). It is an appellant’s burden to bring up a record
sufficient for this court to grant relief. Daniels v. State, 

 (per curiam).
                                                   2