¶1Filed 8/11/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court
¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT
¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
¶11State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
¶13v.
¶15Brandon Morel, Defendant and Appellant
¶19No. 20140454
¶23Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge.
¶25AFFIRMED.
¶27Per Curiam.
¶29Alexander J. Stock, Assistant State’s Attorney, Burleigh County Courthouse, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for plaintiff and appellee.
¶31Danny L. Herbel, The Regency Business Center, 3333 East Broadway Avenue, Suite 1205, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for defendant and appellant.
¶33Ken R. Sorenson, Office of the Attorney General, 600 East Boulevard Avenue, Department 125, Bismarck, N.D. 58505-0040, for amicus curiae.
¶34State v. Morel
¶35No. 20140454
¶37Per Curiam.
¶38[¶1] Brandon Morel appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found he was guilty of refusal to submit to a chemical test under N.D.C.C. § 39-08-01(1)(e), a class B misdemeanor. Morel argues his prosecution and the refusal statute are unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and N.D. Const. art. I, § 8, and the district court erred in refusing to give his requested jury instruction informing the jury that he had a statutory right to refuse a chemical test.
¶39[¶2] This Court recently rejected an argument that the criminal refusal statute is unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment or N.D. Const. art. I, § 8. See State v. Birchfield , 2015 ND 6, ¶ 19, 858 N.W.2d 302; see also State v. Kordonowy , 2015 ND 197, ¶¶ 11-12 (reaffirming our holding in Birchfield ). We also recently held a district court did not err in refusing to give a defendant’s requested jury instruction informing the jury that he has a right to refuse a chemical test. Kordonowy , at ¶¶ 26-
¶4027. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).
¶41[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
¶42Daniel J. Crothers
¶43Lisa Fair McEvers
¶44Carol Ronning Kapsner
¶45Dale V. Sandstrom