Winarske v. State

¶1Filed 2/12/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court

¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT

¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

¶4

¶5

¶6

¶72015 ND 21

¶8

¶9

¶10

¶11Adam Winarske, Petitioner and Appellant

¶12

¶13v.

¶14

¶15State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

¶16

¶17

¶18

¶19Nos. 20140112-20140118

¶20

¶21

¶22

¶23Appeal from the District Court of Stark County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable William A. Herauf, Judge.

¶24

¶25AFFIRMED.

¶26

¶27Per Curiam.

¶28

¶29Lynn Slaathaug Moen, P.O. Box 547, Mayville, ND 58257, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.

¶30

¶31James Allen Hope, Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 130, Dickinson, ND 58602-0130, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

¶32Winarske v. State

¶33Nos. 20140112-20140118

¶34

¶35Per Curiam.

¶36[¶1] Adam Winarske appealed a district court judgment denying his application for post-conviction relief.  Winarske argued he is entitled to post-conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel, his guilty pleas were not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily given, and he was denied effective assistance of counsel at all stages of the proceedings.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court did not err in dismissing Winarske’s application for post-conviction relief, after an evidentiary hearing.

¶37[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

¶38Dale V. Sandstrom

¶39Daniel J. Crothers

¶40Lisa Fair McEvers

¶41Carol Ronning Kapsner