2015 Pa. Super. 30 - Kindermann, P. v. Cunningham, J.’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Krupinski v. Vocational Technical School Eastern Northampton County · Commonwealth v. McGrogan · Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. Borah · Kiser v. Schulte · Neison v. Hines
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Trial courts have broad discretion to grant or deny a new trial ... [and,] absent a clear abuse of discretion by the trial court, appellate courts must not interfere with the trial court's authority to grant or deny a new trial." [ Harman ,] 756 A.2d [at] 1121-1122 [ ] (internal quotations and citations omitted). In addition, "[t]he trial court's decision whether to limit a new trial to a particular issue or grant a new trial as to all issues will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion." Chiaverini v. Sewickley Valley Hosp. , [ 409 Pa.Super. 630 ], 598 A.2d 1021 , 1024 (Pa. Super. 1991).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.