Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2015 UT 5 - State v. Ashcraft

State v. Ashcraft’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
1
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

47 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Young · State v. Holgate · State v. Carter · State v. Tillman · State v. Nielsen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only when the evidence ... is sufficiently inconclusive or inherently improbable ... that reasonable minds must have entertained a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime for which he or she was convicted.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “In assessing a claim of insufficiency of the evidence, we review the evidence and all inferences which may reasonably be drawn from it in the light most favorable to the verdict of the jury.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “And a jury's inference is reasonable unless it falls to a level of inconsistency or incredibility that no reasonable jury could accept.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.