Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2015 UT App 106 - State v. Gray

2015 UT App 106 - State v. Gray’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Dunn · State v. Holgate · State v. Clark · State v. Tillman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When viewing the variety of circumstances faced by defense counsel, a conscious choice not to object to arguably inadmissible testimony may, at times, fall within the range of legitimate decisions regarding how best to represent a criminal defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.