ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION IV
No. CV-16-371
NICHOLAS LAWSON Opinion Delivered September 28, 2016
APPELLANT
APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
V. COMMISSION [NO. G208057]
MOBILEX USA/TRIDENT USA
HEALTH SERVICES, LLC, and
AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY
OF READING, PA
APPELLEES AFFIRMED
PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge
Appellant Nicholas Lawson appeals a decision by the Workers’ Compensation
Commission (“Commission”) that reversed the opinion of the Administrative Law Judge
(“ALJ”) and found that Lawson had failed to meet his burden of proving a compensable
lumbar injury. His sole argument on appeal is that there was insufficient evidence to support
the Commission’s credibility determination.
Having reviewed the evidence presented, we disagree and affirm by issuing this
memorandum opinion.
We may issue memorandum opinions in any or all of the following cases:
(a) Where the only substantial question involved is the sufficiency of the
evidence;
(b) Where the opinion, or findings of fact and conclusions of law, of the trial
court or agency adequately explain the decision and we affirm;
Cite as
(c) Where the trial court or agency does not abuse its discretion and that is
the only substantial issue involved; and
(d) Where the disposition of the appeal is clearly controlled by a prior
holding of this court or the Arkansas Supreme Court and we do not find that our
holding should be changed or that the case should be certified to the supreme court.
In re Memorandum Opinions,
(1985).
This case falls squarely within categories (a) and (b). The only substantial question on
appeal is whether the Commission’s opinion was supported by sufficient evidence. A review
of the record reflects that it was. Further, the opinion of the Commission adequately explains
the decision reached. Accordingly, we affirm by memorandum opinion.
Affirmed.
GRUBER and HOOFMAN, JJ., agree.
Gary Davis, for appellant.
Worley, Wood & Parrish, P.A., by: Melissa Wood, for appellees.
2
