Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2016 ND 237

State v. Ortiz

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2016

North Dakota Supreme Court · decided 2016-12-20

Decided 2016-12-20

¶1Filed 12/20/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court

¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT

¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

¶4

¶5

¶6

¶72016 ND 237

¶8

¶9

¶10

¶11State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

¶12

¶13v.

¶14

¶15Peter Paul Ortiz, Defendant and Appellant

¶16

¶17

¶18

¶19No. 20160221

¶20

¶21

¶22

¶23Appeal from the District Court of McKenzie County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Robin Ann Schmidt, Judge.

¶24

¶25AFFIRMED.

¶26

¶27Per Curiam.

¶28

¶29Paul R. Emerson, Office of the Attorney General, 600 E. Boulevard Ave., Dept. 125, Bismarck, ND 58505-0040, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

¶30

¶31Laura C. Ringsak, 103 S. Third St., Ste. 6, Bismarck, ND 58501, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

¶32State v. Ortiz

¶33No. 20160221

¶34

¶35Per Curiam.

¶36[¶1] Peter Ortiz appealed the district court’s judgment, which denied his request to withdraw his guilty plea. Ortiz argues the district court abused its discretion in concluding he failed to establish a fair and just reason to warrant the withdrawal of his guilty plea. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Ortiz’s request, we affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

¶37[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

¶38Carol Ronning Kapsner

¶39Lisa Fair McEvers

¶40Daniel J. Crothers

¶41Dale V. Sandstrom

/2016/nd/237 · .json · Public domain