¶1Filed 3/3/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court
¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT
¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
¶11Paul W. Aker, Plaintiff and Appellant
¶13v.
¶15Diane C. Neiber,
¶16f.k.a. Diane C. Aker, Defendant and Appellee
¶20No. 20150229
¶24Appeal from the District Court of Richland County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Bradley Allen Cruff, Judge.
¶26AFFIRMED.
¶28Per Curiam.
¶30Amy M. Clark, 321 Dakota Avenue, P.O. Box 38, Wahpeton, N.D. 58074-0038, and John M. Wilka, 300 North Dakota Avenue, Suite 510, Sioux Falls, S.D. 57104, for plaintiff and appellant; submitted on brief.
¶32Samuel S. Johnson, 205 Seventh Street North, P.O. Box 5, Wahpeton, N.D. 58074-0005, for defendant and appellee; submitted on brief.
¶33Aker v. Neiber
¶34No. 20150229
¶36Per Curiam.
¶37[¶1] Paul Aker appeals a district court order denying his motion to amend parenting time. Aker claims the ongoing conflict between the parties constitutes a material change of circumstances warranting modification, and amending parenting time is in the best interests of the children. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court did not err in finding no material change of circumstances warranting modification of parenting time.
¶38[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
¶39Dale V. Sandstrom
¶40Carol Ronning Kapsner
¶41Lisa Fair McEvers
¶42Daniel J. Crothers