Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2016 ND 51

State v. Odermann

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 2016

North Dakota Supreme Court · decided 2016-03-15

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2023

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2016-03-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Filed 3/15/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court

¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT

¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

¶4

¶5

¶6

¶72016 ND 51

¶8

¶9

¶10

¶11State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

¶12

¶13v.

¶14

¶15Michael Kendrick Odermann, Defendant and Appellant

¶16

¶17

¶18

¶19No. 20150216

¶20

¶21

¶22

¶23Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Jerod E. Tufte, Judge.

¶24

¶25AFFIRMED.

¶26

¶27Per Curiam.

¶28

¶29Frederick R. Fremgen (on brief), State’s Attorney, 511 Second Avenue S.E., Jamestown, ND 58401, for plaintiff and appellee.

¶30

¶31Mark T. Blumer (on brief), P.O. Box 7340, Fargo, ND 58106, for defendant and appellant.

¶32State v. Odermann

¶33No. 20150216

¶34

¶35Per Curiam.

¶36[¶1] Michael Odermann appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of burglary and two counts of theft of property.  He argues the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the convictions.  We conclude there was substantial evidence to support the verdicts and summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

¶37[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

¶38Carol Ronning Kapsner

¶39Lisa Fair McEvers

¶40Daniel J. Crothers

¶41Dale V. Sandstrom

/2016/nd/51 · .json · Public domain