¶1Filed 12/7/17 by Clerk of Supreme Court
¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT
¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
¶11State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
¶13v.
¶15Juan Manuel Palacio, III, Defendant and Appellant
¶19Nos. 20170180 and 20170181
¶23Appeal from the District Court of Stark County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Dann E. Greenwood, Judge.
¶25AFFIRMED.
¶27Per Curiam.
¶29James A. Hope, Assistant State’s Attorney, Dickinson, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
¶31Samuel A. Gereszek, East Grand Forks, MN, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
¶32State v. Palacio
¶33Nos. 20170180 and 20170181
¶35Per Curiam.
¶36[¶1] Juan Manuel Palacio III appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of possession of drug paraphernalia and criminal conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance. Palacio argues the state presented insufficient evidence to uphold the jury’s verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). State v. Gray, 2017 ND 108, ¶¶ 15–16, 893 N.W.2d 484 (affirming judgment where appellant failed to provide a trial transcript on appeal, making it “impossible for this Court to conduct a meaningful and intelligent review” whether the defendant preserved for appeal the issue of insufficiency of the evidence or whether sufficient evidence supported the verdict).
¶37[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
¶38Daniel J. Crothers
¶39Jerod E. Tufte
¶40Jon J. Jensen
¶41Lisa Fair McEvers