State v. Nur

¶1Filed 3/7/17 by Clerk of Supreme Court

¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT

¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

¶4

¶5

¶6

¶72017 ND 43

¶8

¶9

¶10

¶11State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

¶12

¶13v.

¶14

¶15Ibrahim Hassan Nur, Defendant and Appellant

¶16

¶17

¶18

¶19No. 20160257

¶20

¶21

¶22

¶23Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven L. Marquart, Judge.

¶24

¶25AFFIRMED.

¶26

¶27Per Curiam.

¶28

¶29Tristan J. Van de Streek, Assistant State’s Attorney, Cass County Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, ND 58108-2806, for plaintiff and appellee.

¶30

¶31Mark T. Blumer (on brief), P.O. Box 7340, Fargo, ND 58106, and Kiara C. Kraus-Parr (argued), 424 Demers Avenue, Grand Forks, ND 58201, for defendant and appellant.

¶32State v. Nur

¶33No. 20160257

¶34

¶35Per Curiam.

¶36[¶1] Ibrahim Nur appealed the district court’s judgment after a jury found him guilty of burglary. Nur argued the State provided insufficient evidence to identify him as a participant in the burglary. Without bringing a motion under Rule 29, N.D.R.Crim.P., this Court is restricted to reviewing the record for obvious error.  State v. Yineman, 2002 ND 145, ¶ 21, 651 N.W.2d 648.  We find no obvious error in the trial. We summarily affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

¶37[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

¶38Jerod E. Tufte

¶39Daniel J. Crothers

¶40Lisa Fair McEvers

¶41Carol Ronning Kapsner

¶42