Thompson v. State

¶1Filed 3/30/17 by Clerk of Supreme Court

¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT

¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

¶4

¶5

¶6

¶72017 ND 63

¶8

¶9

¶10

¶11Ronald Scott Thompson, Plaintiff and Appellant

¶12

¶13v.

¶14

¶15State of North Dakota, Defendant and Appellee

¶16

¶17

¶18

¶19No. 20160320

¶20

¶21

¶22

¶23Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.

¶24

¶25AFFIRMED.

¶26

¶27Per Curiam.

¶28

¶29Charles A. Stock, P.O. Box 605, Crookston, Minn. 56716-0605, for plaintiff and appellant.

¶30

¶31Brian L. Johnson, Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for defendant and appellee.

¶32Thompson v. State

¶33No. 20160320

¶34

¶35Per Curiam.

¶36[¶1] Ronald Thompson appeals from an order entered on remand denying his application for post-conviction relief.  After our remand in Thompson v. State , 2016 ND 101, 879 N.W.2d 93, the district court made findings and denied Thompson’s post-conviction relief application claiming ineffective assistance of counsel.  Thompson argues the district court erred in finding no reasonable probability existed that he would have insisted on proceeding to trial but for the controversy over the DNA test results.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

¶37[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

¶38Daniel J. Crothers

¶39Lisa Fair McEvers

¶40Carol Ronning Kapsner

¶41Jerod E. Tufte