Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 ND 97 - Booth v. State

Booth v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hill v. Lockhart · 18 Cal. 4th 349 - People v. Kipp · Premo v. Moore · Premo v. Moore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Courts need not address both prongs of the Strickland test, and if a court can resolve the case by addressing only one prong it is encouraged to do so.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “show that counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “must allege facts that, if proven, would support a conclusion that rejection of the plea bargain would have been rational because valid defenses existed, a suppression motion could have undermined the prosecution's case, or there was a realistic potential for a lower sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.