Booth v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hill v. Lockhart · 18 Cal. 4th 349 - People v. Kipp · Premo v. Moore · Premo v. Moore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Courts need not address both prongs of the Strickland test, and if a court can resolve the case by addressing only one prong it is encouraged to do so.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Rourke v. State · Oien v. State“show that counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Rourke v. State · Davies v. State“must allege facts that, if proven, would support a conclusion that rejection of the plea bargain would have been rational because valid defenses existed, a suppression motion could have undermined the prosecution's case, or there was a realistic potential for a lower sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Morales v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.