Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2018 UTAPP 144 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Henderson v. Morgan · Bradshaw v. Stumpf · State v. Johnson · State v. Gibbons · State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must show either that he did not in fact understand the nature of the constitutional protections that he was waiving by pleading guilty, or that he had such an incomplete understanding of the charge that his plea cannot stand as an intelligent admission of guilt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “may be withdrawn only upon leave of the court and a showing that it was not knowingly and voluntarily made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “far from the model colloquy envisioned by rule 11 [of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure],”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.