202 U.S. 150
Docket No. 214.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1906-04-30
<p>CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.</p>
Relies on Hayes v. State of Missouri · Dunlop v. United States · Fitzpatrick v. United States
Cited in Case Law’s definition of “qualified or 'stand-aside' challenge by the Crown/government” · Case Law’s definition of “waiver of self-incrimination privilege by defendant who testifies”
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · 6–3 · Decided 1906-04-30
Cited by 66 later decisions (9 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2008 · most notably Swain v. State of Alabama (1965), Caminetti v. United States (1917)
53 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.
¶4As the facts in this case are practically the same as those set forth in the preceding and the legal principles are identical, this is also
¶5Affirmed.
¶6Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Peckham dissented',in both cases.