State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Ryan Michael Lindquist, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20200022
Appeal from the District Court of McLean County, South Central Judicial
District, the Honorable Cynthia Feland, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Ladd R. Erickson, State’s Attorney, Washburn, ND, for plaintiff and appellee;
submitted on brief.
Russell J. Myhre, Enderlin, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on
brief.
State v. Lindquist
No. 20200022
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Ryan Lindquist appeals from a criminal judgment after entering
conditional pleas following an order denying his motion to suppress. On
appeal, Lindquist states his “main contention upon [his] motion to suppress
was that because Lindquist was immediately detained at the scene . . . [his]
detention was violative of Lindquist’s Fourth Amendment rights.” While
Lindquist makes a conclusory statement that his detention was unlawful, he
failed to adequately develop an argument in support of this contention. The
district court’s findings have adequate support in the record. “Our Court will
not consider an argument that is not adequately articulated, supported, and
briefed.” State v. Bachmeier,
. We
summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2),(7).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte
Gerald W. VandeWalle
1
