A criminal judgment entered after a jury found the defendant guilty of gross sexual imposition is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7).
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Thomas Lynn Olsen, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20210127
Appeal from the District Court of Griggs County, Southeast Judicial District,
the Honorable James D. Hovey, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Jayme J. Tenneson, State’s Attorney, Lakota, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.
Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Olsen
No. 20210127
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Thomas Olsen appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury
found him guilty of gross sexual imposition. On appeal, Olsen argues the
district court erred in denying his N.D.R.Crim.P. 29 motion regarding time as
an essential element. He also argues the court’s preliminary ruling on probable
cause pursuant to N.D.R.Crim.P. 4, 5, and 5.1 undermines the integrity of the
judicial process. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7);
State v. Montplaisir,
(“A defendant who is
found guilty at trial may not, on appeal, challenge the district court’s decision
on probable cause at the preliminary hearing.”).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte
1