Three amended criminal judgments are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8) because the appellant's brief did not contain the minimum requirements of N.D.R.App.P. 28.
Decided 2022-09-29
FILED
IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
SEPTEMBER 29, 2022
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Christopher Lockwood, Defendant and Appellant
Nos. 20220019, 20220020 and
20220021
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial
District, the Honorable Daniel J. Borgen, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Joshua A. Amundson, Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff
and appellee; submitted on brief.
Christopher W. Lockwood, Bismarck, ND, self-represented, defendant and
appellant; submitted on brief.
State v. Lockwood
Nos. 20220019, 20220020 & 20220021
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Christopher Lockwood appeals from three amended criminal judgments
revoking his probation and resentencing him. It is unclear what Lockwood
argues on appeal because his brief does not contain the minimum requirements
in N.D.R.App.P. 28. Under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8), this Court may summarily
affirm a judgment if the appellant’s brief fails to comply with N.D.R.App.P. 28.
We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte
1
