State's appeal Reagan Tokes Law, S.B. 201 contrary to law. The trial court's sentence was contrary to law because it failed to sentence appellant in accordance with the Reagan Tokes Law, which this court found to be constitutional in State v. Delvallie, 2022-Ohio-470, 185 N.E.3d 538 (8th Dist.).
.]
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
STATE OF OHIO, :
Plaintiff-Appellant, :
No. 111880
v. :
DAVID DOTSON, :
Defendant-Appellee. :
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
JUDGMENT: REVERSED AND REMANDED
RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: March 16, 2023
Criminal Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas
Case No. CR-22-669100-A
Appearances:
Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting
Attorney, and Daniel T. Van, Assistant Prosecuting
Attorney, for appellant.
Cullen Sweeney, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and
Erika B. Cunliffe, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.
MICHAEL JOHN RYAN, P.J.:
Plaintiff-appellant state of Ohio (“the state”) appeals from the trial
court’s judgment that found S.B. 201, the Reagan Tokes Law, unconstitutional and
thus the trial court did not sentence defendant-appellee David Dotson accordingly.
Pursuant to this court’s en banc decision in State v. Delvallie,
(8th Dist.), finding the Reagan Tokes Law constitutional, we reverse the
trial court’s judgment and remand the matter for resentencing.
Dotson entered a guilty plea to felonious assault and having weapons
while under disability. The trial court sentenced Dotson to a definite sentence of
three years for felonious assault to run concurrent to 24 months for having weapons
while under disability. The trial court’s journal entry noted that the “court
determined the provisions of S.B. 201 to be unconstitutional as to Count 1”
(felonious assault).
The state timely appealed, assigning a single error for our review:
“The trial court plainly erred when it found S.B. 201 to be unconstitutional and did
not impose an indefinite sentence pursuant to S.B. 201.”
Pursuant to R.C. 2953.08(B)(2), the state has the right to appeal a
sentence that is contrary to law. “A sentence that fails to impose a mandatory
provision is contrary to law.” State v. Potter, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 111782, 2023-
Ohio-534, ¶ 4, citing State v. Underwood,
, ¶ 21. In Delvallie, this court held that the Reagan Tokes Law is
constitutional and overruled the same arguments that Dotson has raised in his
appeal. Dotson concedes as much in his brief but maintains that Delvallie was
incorrectly decided.
Because the trial court failed to impose an indefinite sentence on
Dotson’s qualifying offense in accordance with the Reagan Tokes Law, the sentence
was contrary to law. The state’s sole assignment of error is sustained.
The trial court’s judgment was contrary to law because it failed to
sentence Dotson in accordance with the Reagan Tokes Law, which this court found
constitutional in Delvallie. The trial court’s judgment is reversed, and the matter is
remanded for resentencing in accordance with the Reagan Tokes Law.
It is ordered that appellant recover of appellee costs herein taxed.
The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the
common pleas court to carry this judgment into execution.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27
of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
________________________
MICHAEL JOHN RYAN, JUDGE
FRANK DANIEL CELEBREZZE, III, P.J., and
EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR
