[Cite as State v. Marshall,
2024-Ohio-688.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
BUTLER COUNTY
STATE OF OHIO, :
Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2023-03-036
: OPINION
- vs - 2/26/2024
:
THOMAS LEE MARSHALL, :
Appellant. :
CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Case No. CR2022-05-0729
Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael Greer, Assistant
Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Law Office of John H. Forg, and John H. Forg, III, for appellant.
BYRNE, J.
{¶ 1} Thomas Lee Marshall appeals from his convictions for rape and gross sexual
imposition in the Butler County Court of Common Pleas. For the reasons described below,
we affirm.
Butler CA2023-03-036
I. Factual and Procedural Background
{¶ 2} In June 2022, a Butler County grand jury indicted Marshall on six counts,
consisting of five counts of rape (Counts One through Five) and one count of gross sexual
imposition (Count Six). The alleged victim in all counts was Marshall's daughter, "Heather."1
{¶ 3} The indictment arose after Heather, by then an adult, accused her father of
instructing her to touch him sexually and raping her between 2001 and 2006, when she was
six to ten years old. The matter proceeded to a jury trial. We will summarize the key
testimony presented at trial below.
A. The State's Case
1. Heather's Testimony and Heather's Journal
{¶ 4} Heather testified at trial that she was born in 1995 and that she was 27 years
old. She grew up in two different homes in West Chester and Liberty Township, Ohio. She
grew up living with her mother, father, brother, and older half-sister. Her brother, "Adam,"
was four years younger than her. He suffered from spinal muscular atrophy and low IQ.
Adam required a "lot of attention."
{¶ 5} Heather's father⎯Marshall⎯was in charge of "bath time." When she and
Adam were very young, Marshall would give them baths at the same time. However, when
Heather turned six, Marshall began bathing her alone.
{¶ 6} Heather testified that when she was six years old, after bath time, when she
was clean, Marshall told her it was "game time." He then put his fingers in her vagina.
{¶ 7} Heather recalled another time when she was six years old that Marshall put
his fingers in her vagina. This again happened during bath time. This time, Marshall was
1. "Heather" is a pseudonym, adopted in this opinion for purposes of preserving the victim's privacy and to
improve readability. We also use pseudonyms to refer to all individuals in this opinion who were children at
the times of the offenses. See In re A.P., 12th Dist. Warren No. CA2022-01-002, 2022-Ohio-3181, ¶ 2, fn.1;
see also Ohio Constitution, Article I, Section 10a(A)(1) (requiring that victims in the criminal and juvenile justice
systems "be treated with fairness and respect for the victim's safety, dignity and privacy"). (Emphasis added.)
-2-
Butler CA2023-03-036
masturbating and ejaculated. Heather clarified that this was how she recalled the event as
an adult, and that as a child she thought Marshall was "peeing."
{¶ 8} On another occasion during bath time, when she was six years old, Marshall
again told her it was "game time." He taught her how to give him a "hand job;" that is, he
taught her to use her hand to rub his penis.
{¶ 9} Heather recalled being in her bedroom when she was seven years old.
Marshall told her it was "game time." He told her to lick his penis. Then he told her to put
his entire penis in her mouth. She recalled feeling like she could not breathe and that she
choked on his penis.
{¶ 10} In a separate incident that occurred in the bathroom when Heather was seven
years old, Marshall put his penis in Heather's mouth. He ejaculated inside her mouth and
she spit his semen out. He slapped her for spitting it out.
{¶ 11} When she was nine or ten years old, Marshall told Heather that they would
play "special game time." After she bathed, he had her stand on the ledge of the tub, bent
over and facing away from him, with her hands on the wall. He then covered her mouth
with his hand and put his penis inside of her vagina. It was very painful and she screamed.
{¶ 12} "Special game time" also happened in her bedroom. Heather recalled that
she was nine or ten years old and lying on her back in bed. Marshall told her that they were
going to play "special game time," and then he put his penis in her vagina. Again, it was
painful.
{¶ 13} Heather testified that during all these events, her mother was not in the home
or was not around. These events occurred in one of the two homes that Heather lived in
between the ages of six and ten and happened only in the bathroom and in her bedroom.
{¶ 14} When she was ten years old, Heather asked her mother if she could start
taking showers, by herself. Her mother agreed. Marshall no longer abused her after she
-3-
Butler CA2023-03-036
started showering on her own.
{¶ 15} Heather testified that she regularly journaled throughout her childhood and
that she recalled journaling about the abuse when it was occurring. She identified a journal
that she kept during the time the abuse was ongoing. The journal covered the period of
February 2004 (when Heather was eight years old) to January 2007 (when she was 11
years old). State's Exhibits 17 through 60 consisted of individual pages of that journal.
{¶ 16} Certain pages of the journal exhibits were partially redacted. For example,
certain pages of the journal exhibits only include the date, the salutation "Dear Diary," and
a sign-off, such as "Love, Heather," with the entire content of the journal entry redacted. In
some instances, only part of the journal entry was redacted. The state questioned Heather
as to the content of each page of the journal.
{¶ 17} Exhibit 21 was a journal entry dated February 29, 2004, when Heather would
have been eight years old, almost a nine-year-old.2 In the entry, Heather wrote about
winning a state championship for swimming, that Marshall bought her a milkshake
afterwards, that her mother said she could have anything she wanted, and that she wanted
an alarm clock.
{¶ 18} The state also introduced various photographs depicting Heather during the
same period when the abuse was occurring. Relevant to Exhibit 21, Exhibits 7 and 10 are
photographs depicting Heather holding or displaying swimming trophies. During her
testimony, Heather estimated that she was six and eight years old in these two photographs.
{¶ 19} In Exhibit 22, a journal entry dated March 2, 2004, just days before her ninth
birthday, Heather journaled about the abuse. She wrote,
Dad and I played game time again. Mama went to the store and
he tucked me in. He told me one day I will be too old for game
time. I think game time isn't fun. Maybe 9 years old will be too
2. Heather was born in March 1995.
-4-
Butler CA2023-03-036
old for game time. I turn 9 in 5 days! He licked my privates
again and it was gross! I also touched his privates and it got big
again and then he touched it and I stopped. He always kind of
pees on himself after and it's gross. Maybe when I turn 9 I'll be
too old.
{¶ 20} In Exhibit 29, a journal entry dated July 3, 2004, Heather wrote again about
winning an award at a swim meet. She also wrote that Marshall and her older sister were
proud of her and that they went to get "McFlurrys" afterward.
{¶ 21} In State's Exhibit 30, a journal entry dated August 9, 2004, Heather wrote
about school starting soon and discussed her new teacher. She wrote that a person she
knew was going to be in her class. She mentioned telling that person that,
I don't have a boyfriend any more and that's because all boys
are gross except [Adam]. Especially dad is gross because he
likes to do gross things during game time. … Dad said I'm
getting better at licking his privates. I still hate it.
{¶ 22} In State's Exhibit 32, a journal entry dated October 31, 2004, Heather wrote,
Happy Halloween! Dad made me my spongebob costume.
He said tonight at game time we are playing something new. I
really hate game time. Baths are not fun and I wish I could
shower.
While discussing this journal entry, the state questioned Heather concerning State's Exhibit
13, which was a photograph of Heather wearing a SpongeBob SquarePants Halloween
costume. Heather confirmed that this was the costume Marshall had made for her and that
she was nine years old in the photograph.
{¶ 23} In State's Exhibit 33, a journal entry dated November 2, 2004, Heather wrote,
Dad put his privates inside my privates. I think that's what they
do in the movies. I thought it was fake and I bet it is because it
hurts so bad. He hit me for yelling. I really hate him.
{¶ 24} In State's Exhibit 34, a journal entry dated November 29, 2004, Heather wrote,
Dad put his privates inside mine again. This time it was in bed
and not in the bath. I feel like I am dying. I don't want to live
anymore maybe when I am 10 I will be too old.
-5-
Butler CA2023-03-036
{¶ 25} In State's Exhibit 36, a journal entry dated December 25, 2004, Heather wrote,
Merry Christmas! Mama gave me an ipod and I already put all
my Michael Jackson songs on it! I can listen to him on the bus
now!
The state introduced several photographs of Heather's childhood bedroom. These
photographs depict Michael Jackson posters on the walls of the bedroom.
{¶ 26} In State's Exhibit 37, a journal entry dated March 7, 2005 (Heather's tenth
birthday), Heather wrote,
Happy birthday to me! Mama let me stay home from school and
we went to see the Robots movie! My party was Saturday and
I was in a bad mood because dad is mad at me since I told
mama I want to take showers now. Friday he gave me a bath
and he covered my mouth when he did sex and I wanted to stab
him. I wanted to poke his eyes out. I just don't like that he's
mad at me now.
{¶ 27} In State's Exhibit 38, a journal entry dated April 1, 2005, Heather wrote,
Dad hasn't really talked to me much since I started showering.
He probably hates me. Why didn't I stop baths sooner? Am I
stupid? I hated game time so much and I didn't quit! Dummy!
{¶ 28} In State's Exhibit 47, a journal entry dated February 20, 2006, when Heather
was nearly 11 years old, she wrote about an interaction she had with "Claire," her cousin,
who was about one year older than Heather:
I watched Chicago with [Claire] and the sex scene happened
and I told her I did that before and she didn't believe me.
Heather's handwriting changed to cursive in this journal entry. When asked why she
switched to cursive, Heather testified, "I grew up."
{¶ 29} In State's Exhibit 49, a journal entry dated May 15, 2006, Heather wrote,
[Claire] made the bratz dolls have sex and I told her that's only
supposed to be for making babies and she said she thought it
was for fun. Why would that be fun? It's gross and it hurts.
{¶ 30} In State's Exhibit 54, a journal entry dated August 28, 2006, Heather wrote
-6-
Butler CA2023-03-036
about starting 6th grade. She mentioned being in band class and that she picked the flute
to play because her mom told her she would be good at it. Relevant to State's Exhibit 54,
State's Exhibit 16 is a photograph of Heather at a band concert, holding a flute. Heather
estimated that she was 11 or 12 years old in that photograph.
{¶ 31} In State's Exhibit 55, a journal entry dated September 19, 2006, Heather wrote
about having a nightmare about Marshall,
I had a nightmare last night about dad. I woke up and I thought
he was in my room even though he wasn't. I hate feeling scared.
I know I'm old enough now to not be scared but sometimes I am.
I wish someone could help me not be scared!
{¶ 32} In State's Exhibit 59, a journal entry dated December 26, 2006, Heather wrote,
I got my first high heels for Christmas! They are silver and
sparkly size 10! I am so excited!
Relevant to State's Exhibit 59, State's Exhibit 15 is a photograph of Heather wearing
pajamas and smiling, admiring the high heel shoes she is wearing. Heather testified that
this photograph was of her on Christmas with the high heels referred to in Exhibit 59.
{¶ 33} Finally, in State's Exhibit 60, a journal entry dated January 1, 2007, Heather
wrote,
I am trying my best to forget what dad did and what we did
together but it's so hard. I am about to go crazy. I know that it's
fine and I just have to be a grown up but it makes me scared.
My new years resolution is to forget all of it.
{¶ 34} Heather testified that she never told anyone that Marshall was sexually
abusing her while the abuse was occurring. She explained that she did not tell her mother
because Marshall scared her and she was afraid that she would not be believed.
{¶ 35} On direct examination, Heather admitted to a history of lying. She admitted
making up lies about being sexually assaulted by multiple people. But she stated that when
she lied about being sexually assaulted, those lies never involved Marshall, and only
-7-
Butler CA2023-03-036
involved her "peers."
{¶ 36} Heather explained that she never lied to her mother, but that her mother would
hear about her telling lies to other people. Heather explained that she would lie to her
friends, who would tell their parents, who would then contact her mother. Her mother would
confront her about what she had been telling her friends and she would admit to her mother
that she had been lying. Heather stated that she never escalated a lie to the attention of
the police.
{¶ 37} Heather stated that she began lying when she was six years old. She would
lie to get sympathy and attention. Heather explained,
all of my lies have been directly correlated to things that my dad
actually had done to me. So the lies that I would tell were those
same things. And that was my way of getting the sympathy and
care that I needed without actually telling what was going on.
{¶ 38} Heather stated that in 2018 she told her therapist what Marshall had done to
her during her childhood. Her therapist asked her to look for the journal she kept during the
years she was abused. Heather went to her mother's house and found the journal in a
closet. She eventually reported Marshall's crimes to the police in early 2022.
{¶ 39} On cross-examination, Heather admitted that she once told a "story" to
someone about engaging in oral sex with her father outside of school in the daytime. She
also admitted that, in a text message, she said that Marshall had anal sex with her and also
with Claire, when both girls were ten years old. She also admitted journaling about anal
sex and journaling that Claire told her about having anal sex with Marhsall.
{¶ 40} Heather admitted that when she testified at the grand jury, she did not say that
Marshall had had anal sex with her or that any sexual acts took place outside of the two
homes she grew up in. She also confirmed not telling the investigating detective about anal
sex with Marshall. She did confirm telling the investigating detective that Claire had been
-8-
Butler CA2023-03-036
sexually abused as a child.
{¶ 41} Heather admitted that she lied for attention both as a child and as an adult.
She admitted that, as recently as 2015, she had journaled that she needed to stop lying.
She agreed that "in the last years" she had spoken with her therapist about trying not to lie.
She agreed that in therapy, she had spoken about lying to a friend in 2020, and then
immediately calling the friend back, telling the truth, and resolving the situation.
{¶ 42} Heather stated that she got an adrenaline rush from lying. Heather admitted
that she still had urges to lie, but explained that it was a coping mechanism that she built
up over the course of her lifetime. Heather admitted that she was still "dealing" with the
issue of the urge to lie, but stated that, "I have not lied." (In context, it appears that Heather
was referring to having "not lied" during her trial testimony.)
2. Heather's Mother's Testimony
{¶ 43} Heather's Mother, Julie, testified about Adam's physical and cognitive
disabilities. She first realized that he was developmentally delayed when he was about one
year old, when Heather would have been five years old. Adam had a neuromuscular genetic
disease that was "devastating." He had never walked or crawled. He required 24-hour
care seven days a week for feeding, dressing, and bathing. Julie explained that the process
of getting Adam up in the morning took up to two hours. It involved getting him out of bed,
showering him, dressing him, and then feeding him. Julie provided all day and night care
to Adam until sometime in 2012, when Adam started receiving night nursing assistance.
She said that Adam took "so much of [her] time." When questioned, Julie agreed that,
because of Adam's disabilities, Heather would act like she was not getting enough attention
from her.
{¶ 44} Julie also testified as to Marshall's role in the household. She said he helped,
though he travelled "a lot" for his job. Marshall would handle the "nighttime routine" of
-9-
Butler CA2023-03-036
getting Adam ready for bed. With regard to Heather, Marshall was "usually" in charge of
bath time at night. She recalled that Heather and Adam would take baths together "on
occasion" but "then she [Heather] started bathing by herself." Julie remembered Heather
requesting at some point to take showers. When asked why that stood out in her mind,
Julie responded, "I just thought it was a little -- not odd -- I guess …."
{¶ 45} Julie agreed that Heather had a problem with lying. Those lies included
serious matters, such as sexual assault. But Julie stated that Heather would always "come
clean" to her about those lies.
B. The Defense's Case
{¶ 46} Claire, Heather's cousin, was the only witness called by the defense. Claire
testified that when she was young, she and Heather were very close. She would sleepover
at Heather's home frequently. She also saw Marshall, "a lot." She denied seeing Marshall
do anything sexual with Heather.
{¶ 47} Claire denied that Heather ever told her that Heather had sex when she was
between six and ten years old. Claire denied that Heather told her that Heather had anal
sex. Claire also denied telling Heather that Claire had anal sex when she was ten years
old.
{¶ 48} Claire denied ever telling Heather that she had sexual relations with Marshall.
When asked, "Did you ever get abused by or have sex with your uncle?" Claire responded,
"I have never been sexually abused by anybody in my entire life."
C. The Verdicts
{¶ 49} The jury failed to return verdicts on Counts One and Two of the indictment,
which related to alleged incidents of rape that occurred between 2001 and 2002 (Count
- 10 -
Butler CA2023-03-036
One) and 2001 and 2003 (Count Two).3 The jury returned guilty verdicts on the remaining
counts of the indictment, which related to incidents of rape and gross sexual imposition that
occurred between 2002 and 2004 (rape, Count Three), 2004 and 2006 (rape, Count Four),
2004 and 2006 (rape, Count Five), and between 2001 and 2006 (gross sexual imposition,
Count Six). The court sentenced Marshall to a prison term. Marshall appealed, raising one
assignment of error.
II. Law and Analysis
{¶ 50} Marshall's sole assignment of error states:
THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN CONVICTING THOMAS LEE
MARSHALL OF RAPE/GROSS SEXUAL IMPOSITION
AGAINST THE MANIFEST WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE.
A. Marshall's Argument on Appeal
{¶ 51} Marshall's sole assignment of error states that he is challenging the weight of
the evidence supporting his convictions on Counts Three through Six. Consistent with his
assignment of error, Marshall's argument on appeal is that Heather was not a credible
witness. This is a weight-of-the-evidence argument. See State v. Graham, 12th Dist.
Warren No. CA2008-07-095, 2009-Ohio-2814, ¶ 66 (a court considering a weight of the
evidence challenge considers the credibility of the witnesses).
{¶ 52} But after introducing his weight-of-the-evidence argument, Marshall's brief
shifts gears and refers to sufficiency of the evidence. The brief states, "A criminal conviction
challenged on such grounds shall stand so long as there exists sufficient evidence in the
record 'which, if believed, would convince the average mind of the defendant's guilt beyond
a reasonable doubt'⎯that is, without any degree of uncertainty." This is a quotation from a
discussion of sufficiency of the evidence in State v. Eley, 56 Ohio St.2d 169, 172 (1978),
3. There were specific dates alleged in the indictments, correlated to Heather's age (March 7, 2001 through
March 6, 2002, for example). But for purposes of this opinion, those dates are unimportant.
- 11 -
Butler CA2023-03-036
which Marshall cites. This quotation and the citation to Eley seem out of place, given that
Marshall just stated in the assignment of error and the paragraph above that he was making
a weight-of-the-evidence argument. Marshall's next—and only other—citation, to State v.
Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380 (1997), does not clarify the matter, as Marshall did not
include a pinpoint citation clarifying whether he meant to cite the discussion of weight-of-
the-evidence or sufficiency in the Thompkins opinion.
{¶ 53} In the remainder of his brief, Marshall did not claim that the state failed to
submit evidence to prove any element of any of the four counts of which he was convicted
and specifically conceded that the convictions were premised on Heather's testimony and
her childhood journal. He did not present any other argument relating to the sufficiency of
the evidence supporting his convictions. Accordingly, we conclude that Marshall's brief
references to sufficiency were in error, and that Marshall only makes a weight-of-the-
evidence argument on appeal. We therefore do not address the matter of the sufficiency of
the evidence supporting Marshall convictions, other than to note that our holding—
discussed below—that Marshall's convictions were not against the manifest weight of the
evidence would also be dispositive of any sufficiency argument that Marshall may have
brought. State v. Zitney, 12th Dist. Clinton No. CA2020-06-007, 2021-Ohio-466, ¶ 15.
B. Standard of Review
{¶ 54} A manifest weight of the evidence challenge examines the "inclination of the
greater amount of credible evidence, offered at a trial, to support one side of the issue rather
than the other." State v. Barnett, 12th Dist. Butler No. CA2011-09-177, 2012-Ohio-2372, ¶
14. To determine whether a conviction is against the manifest weight of the evidence, the
reviewing court must look at the entire record, weigh the evidence and all reasonable
inferences, consider the credibility of the witnesses, and determine whether in resolving the
conflicts in the evidence, the trier of fact clearly lost its way and created such a manifest
- 12 -
Butler CA2023-03-036
miscarriage of justice that the conviction must be reversed, and a new trial ordered.
Graham, 2009-Ohio-2814 at ¶ 66.
{¶ 55} In reviewing the evidence, an appellate court must be mindful that the original
trier of fact was in the best position to judge the credibility of witnesses and determine the
weight to be given to the evidence. State v. Blankenburg, 197 Ohio App.3d 201, 2012-Ohio-
1289, ¶ 114 (12th Dist.). An appellate court will overturn a conviction due to the manifest
weight of the evidence only in the exceptional case in which the evidence weighs heavily
against the conviction. Zitney at ¶ 15.
C. Analysis
{¶ 56} Marshall argues that Heather's testimony and Heather's childhood journal
were unreliable. He points out that Heather had an admitted history of lying about sexual
abuse, including lying about sexual abuse while journaling. He argues that given Heather's
credibility issues, the jury lost its way in believing her and his convictions were therefore
against the manifest weight of the evidence.
{¶ 57} We have reviewed the record, and we do not agree that the jury lost its way.
As described above, Heather testified to acts of rape and gross sexual imposition committed
by Marshall at various time while she was between the ages of six and ten. The jury
believed Heather as it related to the allegations of Counts Three through Six. A conviction
is not against the manifest weight of the evidence because the jury chooses to believe the
state's witness. State v. McMullen, 12th Dist. Butler Nos. CA2005-09-414, CA2005-10-427,
and CA2005-10-429, 2006-Ohio-4557, ¶ 29.
{¶ 58} The issues concerning Heather's credibility were extensively laid out before
the jury during both her direct examination and her cross-examination. Without
reservations, Heather admitted to her history of lying. She also explained that she only lied
about her peers and that she always admitted lying to her mother when confronted. The
- 13 -
Butler CA2023-03-036
jurors were aware of Heather's propensity to lie even into her adulthood and they were
aware that she continued to struggle with lying and had sought professional help for the
issue. These facts were known to the jury and would have been weighed by the jury in
assessing the truthfulness of her testimony concerning Marshall's actions.
{¶ 59} But contrary to Marshall's argument, Heather's testimony was credible and
convincing, and its credibility was bolstered by a crucial and compelling piece of
corroborating evidence, her childhood journal. Those journal pages, written in the language
of a child, provided a contemporaneous recollection of abuse by Marshall consistent with
her statements as an adult.
{¶ 60} The journal is notable because it consists of Heather simultaneously
documenting the abuse while at the same time documenting the ordinary but memorable
aspects of her young life, such as winning athletic awards, receiving presents, a memorable
Halloween costume, and happenings at school. And the photographs introduced at trial
corroborated many of these ordinary events, such as the photographs of her with trophies,
wearing a custom-made Halloween costume, and playing a flute.
{¶ 61} The jury could conclude that the fact that the photographs corroborate the
innocuous aspects of Heather's journal lent credence to the conclusion that her
documentation of the abuse was also truthful. That is, it would be unexpected for Heather
to truthfully record the regular events of her life, while fabricating ongoing sexual molestation
by her father. Moreover, the fact that this was a personal, and clearly very private journal,
indicates less of a likelihood of lying.4 That is: why would Heather lie to herself about what
she was journaling in private?
{¶ 62} The child-like language used by Heather to describe the abuse is consistent
4. The first page of the journal indicates that the journal belongs to Heather and states, in her handwriting,
"DO NOT TOUCH! If you open this you will die[.]"
- 14 -
Butler CA2023-03-036
with what would be expected from a child attempting to describe sexual molestation when
the child does not realize that molestation is occurring, or even what sex is. It was clear
from her writing that Heather recognized that "game time" was something different than
ordinary father/daughter behavior and she was uncomfortable with it, but she did not realize
how terribly wrong it was until she was older and more mature. Notably, Heather began
writing in cursive in 2006, which she described at trial as a change connected with her
"growing up." It was around this time that she documented having nightmares about the
abuse. The transition in her awareness of the wrongness of "game time" in the journal is
apparent.
{¶ 63} The fact that Marshall dubbed the abuse "game time" also lends credibility to
Heather's claims. It is not surprising that a child abuser might attempt to use a phrase such
as "game time" to confuse or distract a child into believing that what was happening was
not inappropriate or harmful but rather a fun "game."
{¶ 64} The trajectory of the abuse was also realistic. As testified to by Heather, the
abuse began with digital penetration when she was very young, evolved to fellatio, and
ultimately progressed to vaginal penetration, which Marshall called "special game time."
The progressive nature of the abuse as described by Heather at trial was believable and
was corroborated by Heather's journal.
{¶ 65} The jurors also heard from Julie, Heather's mother, about how she was totally
preoccupied caring for Adam and relied upon Marshall to handle the "nighttime routine" and
specifically relied upon him to bathe Heather. This dynamic lent itself to Marshall being
alone with Heather and enabled him to prey on Heather. Julie also corroborated Heather's
testimony and the journal entries indicating that that she asked Julie if she could start taking
showers before the abuse stopped.
{¶ 66} In sum, Heather's history of lying was laid before the jury and so they were
- 15 -
Butler CA2023-03-036
free to credit her testimony with the weight it deserved. However, they were also presented
with substantial other corroborating evidence. Given the testimony and other evidence, we
conclude that the jurors did not lose their way in finding Marshall guilty of Counts Three
through Six.
{¶ 67} Within this assignment of error, and ostensibly related to Marshall's credibility
argument, Marshall also argues that error occurred because the jurors were not permitted
to see portions of the journal in which Heather allegedly lied about other sexual acts.
{¶ 68} This argument is more in line with an evidentiary challenge than a manifest
weight challenge. However, Marshall has not assigned error to the trial court's decision to
admit the journal into evidence with redactions. Nor are we aware of an objection at trial or
during the proceedings with respect to these redactions.5
{¶ 69} Regardless, Marshall contends on appeal that the prosecution submitted
pages from Heather's journal that corroborated her allegations that Marshall had sexually
abused her, but redacted portions of the journal that included allegations that she had sex
in public with Marshall, anal intercourse with Marshall, and that Marshall had sexually
abused Claire. Marshall concedes that Heather was questioned about these matters on
cross-examination and admitted to lying about them but complains that "the jury was unable
to review those redacted pages."
{¶ 70} The unredacted journal was made part of the record but not introduced into
evidence at trial. We have reviewed the unredacted journal. Based on this review, we
conclude that the redacted portions of the journal exhibits do not contain the false
allegations that Marshall discusses above. Instead, the redacted portions of the journal
5. The record reflects that Marshall's defense counsel moved in limine to exclude the entire journal on hearsay
grounds, based on lack of relevancy due to lack of reliability, and due to prejudicial impact. The court overruled
that objection. Counsel renewed that objection at trial before the admission of the journal entries, which was
again overruled. Marshall did not appeal this issue.
- 16 -
Butler CA2023-03-036
essentially consist of Heather discussing events in her life that were irrelevant to the case.
{¶ 71} During her cross-examination, Heather did admit journaling about certain
allegations that were untrue, but she did not specify when she journaled about those matters
and did not state that she wrote about these matters in the journal discussed at trial.
{¶ 72} For these reasons, Marshall's assertion that the redacted pages of Heather's
childhood journal contained the false statements referenced above is simply incorrect.
{¶ 73} Regardless, Marshall does not explain how he was prejudiced. As he admits,
the jurors were aware of the false statements through Heather's cross-examination. The
fact that Heather may have lied about these incidents was therefore known to the jury and
would have been weighed in assessing her truthfulness. Marshall has not demonstrated
the jury lost its way in this regard.
III. Conclusion
{¶ 74} Substantial evidence corroborated Heather's testimony, which the jury was
free to credit or not, and we find that Marshall's convictions were supported by the greater
weight of the evidence. We overrule Marshall's sole assignment of error.
{¶ 75} Judgment affirmed.
PIPER, P.J., and M. POWELL, J., concur.
- 17 -
