Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2025 Ohio 1834

State v. D.G.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 2025

Ohio Court of Appeals · decided 2025-05-22

Trial judge; conflict of interest; prosecutor; expungement; vacated; remanded. We find there was a conflict of interest for the trial court judge to hear appellant's expungement application since the presiding judge was also the prosecutor for appellant's original underlying criminal case from 2001. Judgment denying expungement motion is vacated and matter is remanded to the lower court to be assigned to a judge without a conflict who can hear the motion.

Decided 2025-05-22

[Cite as State v. D.G., 
2025-Ohio-1834
.]

                               COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

                              EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
                                 COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

STATE OF OHIO,                                   :

                 Plaintiff-Appellee,             :
                                                              No. 114412
                 v.                              :

D.G.,                                            :

                 Defendant-Appellant.            :


                                JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

                 JUDGMENT: VACATED AND REMANDED
                 RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: May 22, 2025


             Civil Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas
                               Case No. CR-01-404378-ZA


                                           Appearances:

                 Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting
                 Attorney, and Daniel T. Van, Assistant Prosecuting
                 Attorney, for appellee.

                 Cullen Sweeney, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and
                 Erika B. Cunliffe, Assistant Public Defender, for
                 appellant.

EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, A.J.:

                Upon review of the parties’ briefs and the record, we find that there was

a conflict of interest in the trial court hearing the expungement request in this matter
since the trial judge was the assistant prosecuting attorney who handled the case at

the time of appellant’s guilty plea in 2001. The State has conceded this error.

            As such, we vacate the trial court’s judgment denying the expungement

application and remand the matter to the administrative judge of the Cuyahoga

County Common Pleas Court to be reassigned to a judge without a conflict.

      It is ordered that appellant recover from appellee costs herein taxed.

      The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.

      It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the

common pleas court to carry this judgment into execution.

      A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27

of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.




EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE

MICHELLE J. SHEEHAN, J., and
DEENA R. CALABRESE, J., CONCUR

/2025/ohio/1834 · .json · Public domain