Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2025 Ohio 2039

State v. Miller

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 2025

Ohio Court of Appeals · decided 2025-06-09

Relies on Anders v. California

Decided 2025-06-09

[Cite as State v. Miller, 
2025-Ohio-2039
.]



                                     IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                           TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

                                             BUTLER COUNTY




 STATE OF OHIO,                                    :

        Appellee,                                  :     CASE NOS. CA2024-12-139
                                                                   CA2024-12-140
                                                   :
     - vs -                                                    DECISION AND
                                                   :         JUDGMENT ENTRY
                                                                 6/9/2025
 MATTHEW BENJAMIN MILLER,                          :

        Appellant.                                 :




      CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
                 Case Nos. CR2023-05-0678 and CR2024-03-0396


Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, and John C. Heinkel, Assistant
Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Law Office of John H. Forg, and John H. Forg III, for appellant.



                                             ____________
                                             DECISION

        Per Curiam.

        {¶1}     This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by

appellant, Matthew Benjamin Miller, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the

transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common

Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.
                                                                      Butler CA2024-12-139
                                                                             CA2024-12-140

       {¶2}   Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record

from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the

rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists six

potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," 
Anders at 744
; (3) requests that

this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free

from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4)

requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is

wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have

been served upon appellant.

       {¶3}   Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response

having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error

prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel

for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed

for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.


       HENDRICKSON, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.




                             JUDGMENT ENTRY

      The brief of appellant, filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
 (1967),
properly before this court and having been considered by the court, it is ordered that the
motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this
appeal is hereby dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.




                                              -2-
                                                                    Butler CA2024-12-139
                                                                           CA2024-12-140


      It is further ordered that a mandate be sent to the Butler County Court of Common
Pleas for execution upon this judgment and that a certified copy of this Decision and
Judgment Entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27.

      Costs to be taxed to appellant.




                                        /s/ Robert A. Hendrickson, Presiding Judge



                                        /s/ Robin N. Piper, Judge



                                        /s/ Mike Powell, Judge




                                           -3-

/2025/ohio/2039 · .json · Public domain