Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2025 Ohio 512

In re M.E.B.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 2025

Ohio Court of Appeals · decided 2025-02-18

APPELLATE REVIEW - App.R. 4(A); thirty-day rule; Civ.R. 58(B); untimely appeal.

Relies on State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams County Board of Elections · Coles v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp.

Decided 2025-02-18

[Cite as In re M.E.B., 
2025-Ohio-512
.]


                    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
                     ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
                           TRUMBULL COUNTY

IN THE MATTER OF:                                CASE NO. 2025-T-0003

M.E.B.
                                                 Civil Appeal from the
                                                 Court of Common Pleas,
                                                 Probate Division


                                                 Trial Court No. 2024 MSA 0019


                                         MEMORANDUM
                                           OPINION

                                    Decided: February 18, 2025
                                    Judgment: Appeal dismissed


Bradley A. Somogyi, Kisling, Nestico & Redick, LLC, 3412 West Market Street, Fairlawn,
OH 44333 (For Appellant).


EUGENE A. LUCCI, J.

        {¶1}    On January 24, 2025, appellant, through counsel, filed an appeal from a

December 13, 2024 entry.

        {¶2}    App.R. 3(A) expressly states that the only jurisdictional requirement for filing

a valid appeal is to file it within the time allowed by App.R. 4. The Supreme Court has

held that the failure to comply with the time requirements of App.R. 4(A) is a jurisdictional

defect, which is fatal to an appeal. See Robin Mobile Home Parks v. Willett, 2024-Ohio-

5651, ¶ 2 (11th Dist.).

        {¶3}    “Subject to the provisions of App.R. 4(A)(3), a party who wishes to appeal

from an order that is final upon its entry shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R.
3 within 30 days of that entry.” See App.R. 4(A)(1). Civ.R. 58(B) directs the clerk of

courts to serve the parties with notice of the entry within three days of entering the

judgment upon the journal. If Civ.R. 58(B) service does not occur within three days, the

time to appeal does not begin to run until service is made and noted on the appearance

docket. Coles v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp., 
163 Ohio App.3d 659
 (11th Dist. 2005).

      {¶4}   In the instant matter, the trial court issued its entry on December 13, 2024.

The clerk of courts noted on the appearance docket that notice of the entry was issued to

the parties on that same date. Therefore, pursuant Civ.R. 58(B), the time to appeal began

to run from December 13, 2024. The deadline for appellant to file his notice of appeal

was January 13, 2024, which was not a holiday or a weekend. Thus, appellant’s January

24, 2025 notice of appeal was untimely filed by 11 days.

      {¶5}   This court is not empowered to extend the time deadline in civil cases.

State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections, 
40 Ohio St.3d 58, 60
 (1988); see

also App.R. 14(B).

      {¶6}   Based upon the foregoing, this appeal is dismissed as untimely filed

pursuant to App.R. 4(A)(1).



ROBERT J. PATTON, P.J.,

JOHN J. EKLUND, J.,

concur.




                                           2

Case No. 2025-T-0003

/2025/ohio/512 · .json · Public domain