Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 SW3D 817 - Pikey v. Bryant

Pikey v. Bryant’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 18 Cal. 4th 1 - Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior Court · 166 Ill. 2d 188 - Boyd v. Travelers Insurance · Nazeri v. Missouri Valley College · Smith v. Howard Johnson Co. · Delgado v. Phelps Dodge Chino, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Plaintiffs’ petition contains no allegations of ultimate facts of a causal relationship between the intentional spoliation and the inability of the Plaintiffs to prove the wrongful death action; or that the intentional spoliation disrupted or prejudiced the wrongful death action in any fashion; or that the intentional spoliation created an inability for Plaintiffs to prevail in the wrongful death action. Without such factual allegations, Plaintiffs’ petition fails to allege a requisite causal connection between the spoliation and the frustration of the civil action, and, therefore, fails to state a cause of action for intentional spoliation of evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““[B]efore a trial court may treat a motion to dismiss as one for summary judgment, when matters outside the pleadings are presented and not excluded, it must notify the parties that it is going to do so and give the parties an opportunity to present all materials pertinent to the motion for summary judgment.” ... “A trial court’s order will constitute a dismissal, and not a summary judgment, where the record contains no evidence that the court notified the parties that it intended to review pleadings and documents as a summary judgment motion, nor that the court considered matters outside the pleadings.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.