Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 Ala. 288 - State Ex Rel. Smith v. Lowe

State Ex Rel. Smith v. Lowe’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
August 2008
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2008

15 state decisions

50192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex parte Croom · Ex parte Vaughan · Ex parte Rhear · Callahan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““is not intended for cases in which the prisoner is indicted for a capital felony, but that the right to bail in such eases is to be determined on habeas corpus, on the hearing of which, the state and the accused are entitled as of right to have the witnesses heard.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.