Russell v. Garrett’s Empirical Analysis
1920
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 1998 · most notably Russell v. Garrett (1922), National Surety Co. v. Julian (1933)
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Huss v. Central Railroad & Banking Co. · Crawford v. Chattanooga Savings Bank · Phillips-Boyd Pub. Co. v. McKinnon · Powell v. Jones · Gillespie v. Campbell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The parties evidently had in mind the time when the note might be foreclosed, and it must be that in the phrase ‘at that time’ they referred to the time when the note would be foreclosed and to the eventuality that such foreclosure would fail to produce funds sufficient to pay the note.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Russell v. Garrett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.