Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

209 F. 749

Docket No. 1,940.

Offner v. United States

Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1913.)

Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1913-10-07

<p>In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois; Kenesaw M. Landis, Judge.</p> <p>Criminal prosecution by. the United States against Morris H. Offner. Judgment of conviction, and defendant brings error.</p>

2 counsel of record

Relies on Baskin v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1913-10-07

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 1984

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

3019131920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois; Kenesaw M. Landis, Judge.

¶2Criminal prosecution by. the United States against Morris H. Offner. Judgment of conviction, and defendant brings error.

¶3Affirmed.

¶4B. M. Shaffner, of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff in error.

¶5James H. Wilkerson and Frederick Dickinson, both of Chicago, Ill., for defendant in error.

¶6Before BAKER, SEAMAN, and KOHLSAAT, Circuit Judges.

¶7PER CURIAM.

¶8This writ of error is brought for review of a judgment upon conviction of the plaintiff in error, under an indictment charging that he testified falsely in bankruptcy proceedings, in violation of section 29b of the Bankruptcy Act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 554 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3433]). The assignment of error and all questions of law presented are substantially identical with those involved in No. 1,939, Baskin v. United States, 209 Fed. 740, decided herewith, and answered by the opinion and rulings therein.

¶9The judgment against the plaintiff in error in the District Court is therefore affirmed.

/209/f1d/749 · .json · Public domain