Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 Ala. App. 499

109 So 557

Beecham v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1926

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1926-06-29

Relies on Ettore v. State · 18 Ala. App. 373 - Ramsey v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1926-06-29

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2008

19 state decisions

110192619301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

*500 RICE, J.

¶1 The state has made a motion to strike the bill of exceptions upon the ground that it was not signed by the presiding judge within 60 days from the date of its presentation, as required by law. The indorsements made by the trial judge show that the bill was presented to him October 29, 1925, and that the same was signed by him January 8, 1926. The bill was not signed within'60 days, but 71 days from the date of presentation. The motion to strike is granted. Code 1923, § 6433; Ettore v. State, 214 Ala. 99, 106 So. 508.

¶2 The only questions presented for review are those resulting from the refusal of certain charges requested by defendant. In the absence of a bill of exceptions we will not review the action of the trial court in refusing requested charges. Ramsey v. State, 18 Ala. App. 373, 92 So. 94.

¶3 Finding no error on the record, the judgment is affirmed.

¶4 Affirmed.

/21/alaapp/499 · .json · Public domain