Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 F.3d 422

Docket No. 94-6082.

Edmond v. Evatt

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 17, 1994. Decided April 6, 1994.

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Thevarathanthrigae Nihal Gunawansa v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-04-06

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-185)

Jesse Edmond, appellant pro se.

William Benson Darwin, Jr., Holcombe, Bomar, Cothran & Gunn, P.A., Spartanburg, SC, for appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Edmond v. Evatt, No. CA-93-185 (D.S.C. Jan. 4, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/21/f3d/422 · .json · Public domain