Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 F.3d 423

Docket No. 94-6032.

James Joseph Owens v. State of Maryland

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted March 17, 1994. Decided April 5, 1994.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-04-05

Relies on In Re Russell A. Lane

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-04-05

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-93-3973-JFM).

James Joseph Owens, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Owens v. Maryland, No. CA-93-3973-JFM (D.Md. Dec. 15, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/21/f3d/423 · .json · Public domain