Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 N.C. App. 316 - State v. Young

21 N.C. App. 316 - State v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently November 2010 · most notably 61 N.C. App. 531 - State v. Williamson (1983), 74 N.C. App. 565 - State v. Crouch (1985)

38 state decisions

12019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Hewett · State v. Robinson · State v. Caudle · 10 N.C. App. 476 - Cox v. Cox · 13 N.C. App. 382 - State v. Foust

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If, upon a proceeding to revoke probation or a suspended sentence, a defendant wishes, to rely upon his inability to make payments as required by its terms, he should offer evidence of his inability for consideration by the judge. Otherwise, evidence establishing that defendant has failed to make payments as required by the judgment may justify a finding by the judge that defendant’s failure to comply was willful or was without lawful excuse.” State v. Young, 21 N.C. App. 316, 320-21 , 204 S.E. 2d 185, 187 (1974).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A proceeding to revoke probation is not a criminal prosecution but is a proceeding solely for the determination by the court whether there has been a violation of a valid condition of probation so as to warrant putting into effect a sentence theretofore entered; and while notice in writing to defendant, and an opportunity for him to be heard, are necessary, the court is not bound by strict rules of evidence, and all that is required is that there be competent evidence reasonably sufficient to satisfy the judge in the exercise of a sound judicial discretion that the defendant had, without lawful excuse, willfully violated a valid condition of probation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Although revocation of probation results in the deprivation of a probationer’s liberty, the sentence he may be required to serve is the punishment for the crime of which he had previously been found guilty. The inquiry of the court at such a hearing is not directed to the probationer’s guilt or innocence, but to the truth of the accusation of a violation of probation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.