Mulligan v. Andrews’s Empirical Analysis
211 F.2d 28 · 1954
Citation profile
46 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently May 2002 · most notably Miller v. Avirom (1967), Board of Public Instruction v. Finch (1969)
46 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hormel v. Helvering · Borak v. Biddle · Ward v. Anderson · Borak v. Biddle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the conclusion has been reached that the evidence is such as to show your unsuitability for continuance in the Internal Revenue Service.” The present case is not at all parallel; it can hardly be disputed that the Director of the Bureau found that the two specific”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.